சனி, டிசம்பர் 31, 2011
CYCLONE HITS PUDUCHERRY
CYCLONE HITS PUDUCHERRY AND DEVASTED.
BUT THE BSNL SERVICE STOOD COMPLEATE THROUGHT CYCLONE PERIOD .BOTH LAND LINE AND CELL SERVICE FULLY AVAIALBLE TO THE SUBSCRIBER.
THAT IS BSNL.
BUT THE BSNL SERVICE STOOD COMPLEATE THROUGHT CYCLONE PERIOD .BOTH LAND LINE AND CELL SERVICE FULLY AVAIALBLE TO THE SUBSCRIBER.
THAT IS BSNL.
புதன், டிசம்பர் 21, 2011
VRS not a right: Supreme Court
VRS not a right: Supreme Court
Legal Correspondent
Employer must accept applications received
________________________________________
• VRS was not a proposal or an offer but merely an invitation
• Competent authority has absolute discretion to accept or reject request
• Voluntary retirement will not take effect unless accepted in writing by competent authority
________________________________________
New Delhi : The Supreme Court on Wednesday held that voluntary retirement of an employee under a scheme cannot be sought as a matter of right and it is not mandatory for the employer to accept all applications received under the scheme.
A Bench, comprising Justice A.R. Lakshmanan and Justice Tarun Chatterjee, said the request of employees seeking voluntary retirement was not to take effect unless and until it was accepted in writing by the competent authority.
It noted that the competent authority had the absolute discretion whether to accept or reject the request of the employee seeking voluntary retirement under the scheme.
It said that VRS was not a proposal or an offer but merely an invitation and the applications filed by the employees constituted an offer and it could be rejected.
In the instant case, T.S.N. Raju and R. Rama Rao, two employees of the Visakhapatnam Port Trust (VPT), rejected the request of two employees who sought retirement under the VRS. On a writ petition, a single judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court directed the VPT to accept the VRS.
On appeal, a Division Bench affirmed the directions of the single judge and asked the VPT to pass orders in one month. The present appeal was against this judgment.
Allowing the appeal, the apex court Bench said the VPT had an absolute right either to accept or reject the applications filed by the employees for retirement under the VRS.
Writing the judgment for the Bench, Justice Lakshmanan said the order of the single judge was without jurisdiction and beset with material irregularities.
The Bench said that at any rate the single judge could only direct the VPT to consider the applications for voluntary retirement and pass appropriate orders and he could not give a direction that the applications should be accepted.
It said the VPT Chairman was competent to frame the scheme having regard to the exigencies of work and no one could claim voluntary retirement as a right. The judges pointed out that the VPT had the absolute discretion in this matter and there was no assurance that once an application was submitted it would be accepted.
The reasons assigned by the single judge and the division bench were erroneous and unsound, the Bench held and set aside the impugned judgment.
Legal Correspondent
Employer must accept applications received
________________________________________
• VRS was not a proposal or an offer but merely an invitation
• Competent authority has absolute discretion to accept or reject request
• Voluntary retirement will not take effect unless accepted in writing by competent authority
________________________________________
New Delhi : The Supreme Court on Wednesday held that voluntary retirement of an employee under a scheme cannot be sought as a matter of right and it is not mandatory for the employer to accept all applications received under the scheme.
A Bench, comprising Justice A.R. Lakshmanan and Justice Tarun Chatterjee, said the request of employees seeking voluntary retirement was not to take effect unless and until it was accepted in writing by the competent authority.
It noted that the competent authority had the absolute discretion whether to accept or reject the request of the employee seeking voluntary retirement under the scheme.
It said that VRS was not a proposal or an offer but merely an invitation and the applications filed by the employees constituted an offer and it could be rejected.
In the instant case, T.S.N. Raju and R. Rama Rao, two employees of the Visakhapatnam Port Trust (VPT), rejected the request of two employees who sought retirement under the VRS. On a writ petition, a single judge of the Andhra Pradesh High Court directed the VPT to accept the VRS.
On appeal, a Division Bench affirmed the directions of the single judge and asked the VPT to pass orders in one month. The present appeal was against this judgment.
Allowing the appeal, the apex court Bench said the VPT had an absolute right either to accept or reject the applications filed by the employees for retirement under the VRS.
Writing the judgment for the Bench, Justice Lakshmanan said the order of the single judge was without jurisdiction and beset with material irregularities.
The Bench said that at any rate the single judge could only direct the VPT to consider the applications for voluntary retirement and pass appropriate orders and he could not give a direction that the applications should be accepted.
It said the VPT Chairman was competent to frame the scheme having regard to the exigencies of work and no one could claim voluntary retirement as a right. The judges pointed out that the VPT had the absolute discretion in this matter and there was no assurance that once an application was submitted it would be accepted.
The reasons assigned by the single judge and the division bench were erroneous and unsound, the Bench held and set aside the impugned judgment.
திங்கள், டிசம்பர் 19, 2011
com.RAJARATHINAM PASSED AWAY
COM.RAJARATHINAM EX.CIRCLE SECY FOR ADMN AND VICEPRESIDENT TO NFTE COMBINED UNION.HE WAS FUNCTIONED AS
STAFF SIDE LEADER IN JCM CIRCLE COUNCIL.HE WAS FULL KNOWLEDGE ON ALL RULINGS. HE ALSO ASSOCIATED WITH SWAMY NEWS PUBLISHING WORKS.OUR DIST UNION CONDLOE FOR HIS DEATH
STAFF SIDE LEADER IN JCM CIRCLE COUNCIL.HE WAS FULL KNOWLEDGE ON ALL RULINGS. HE ALSO ASSOCIATED WITH SWAMY NEWS PUBLISHING WORKS.OUR DIST UNION CONDLOE FOR HIS DEATH
சனி, டிசம்பர் 17, 2011
com.krishnan,Ex circle president expired
தோழர் கிருஸ்ணன் ,முன்னாள் மாநிலத்தலைவர்,லைன்ஸ்டாப்சங்கம்,மறைவுக்கு நமது மாவட்டசங்கத்தின் ஆழ்ந்த் இரங்கலைத்,அஞ்சலியை தெரிவித்துக்கொள்கிறொம்
வெள்ளி, டிசம்பர் 16, 2011
வாய்சவடால் நம்புதிரி சங்கம்
வேலை நிறுத்தம் வெற்றியாக நடைபெற்று காரணத்தால் அழைத்து பேசினார் என வாய்சவடால் நம்புதிரி சங்கம் பெருமை பேசியுள்ளது. ஆனால் சங்கம் அழைத்து பேசமறுத்த ச்ம்ட் கண்டித்து ச்ம்ட் அறைமுன் தார்ணா நடத்தி பேச செய்தோம் எனெ வாக்குமூலம் அளித்துள்ளது.கெட்டிகாரன் புளூகு எத்தனை நாள்
In totality, it is observed that BSNL Management & Govt. is not at all interested to resolve any of the issue immediately but trying to lingering on the problems. In view of the above, to save BSNL & its employees, sustained struggle is needed and shortly JAC after analyzing the situation will further decide future course of actions which may be in terms of indefinite strike.
AIBSNLEA-15\12\2011
In totality, it is observed that BSNL Management & Govt. is not at all interested to resolve any of the issue immediately but trying to lingering on the problems. In view of the above, to save BSNL & its employees, sustained struggle is needed and shortly JAC after analyzing the situation will further decide future course of actions which may be in terms of indefinite strike.
AIBSNLEA-15\12\2011
வியாழன், டிசம்பர் 15, 2011
வேலை நிறுத்தம் வெற்றி
வேலை நிறுத்தம் வெற்றியாக நடை பெற்றுள்ளது. AIBSNLEA \JACசங்கம் CMD கேரோ செய்து கோரிககை பேசியபின்பு, காலவரையற்ற வேலைநிறுத்தம் வேண்டும் என கூறியுள்ளது. நமது சங்கம் தேசிய செயற்குழு காலவரையற்ற வேலைநிறுத்தம் வேண்டும் முடிவு செய்துள்ளது.காலதாமதமாக AIBSNLEA \JAC இந்தனிலை எடுத்தாலும் அதை நோக்கி அனைவரும் செல்ல திட்டமிடவேண்டும்.
In totality, it is observed that BSNL Management & Govt. is not at all interested to resolve any of the issue immediately but trying to lingering on the problems. In view of the above, to save BSNL & its employees, sustained struggle is needed and shortly JAC after analyzing the situation will further decide future course of actions which may be in terms of indefinite strike.
AIBSNLEA-15\12\2011
In totality, it is observed that BSNL Management & Govt. is not at all interested to resolve any of the issue immediately but trying to lingering on the problems. In view of the above, to save BSNL & its employees, sustained struggle is needed and shortly JAC after analyzing the situation will further decide future course of actions which may be in terms of indefinite strike.
AIBSNLEA-15\12\2011
திங்கள், டிசம்பர் 12, 2011
STRIKE CONFIRMED-
வேலை நிறுத்தம் உறுதி
நமது கூட்டணி நிர்வாகத்துடன் நடைபெற்ற பேச்சுவார்த்தை பலனின்றி போனதால் வேலை நிறுத்தம் உறுதியானது. வேலை நிறுத்தம் வெற்றியடைய அனைவரும் செயலாற்றுவோம்,
நமது கூட்டணி நிர்வாகத்துடன் நடைபெற்ற பேச்சுவார்த்தை பலனின்றி போனதால் வேலை நிறுத்தம் உறுதியானது. வேலை நிறுத்தம் வெற்றியடைய அனைவரும் செயலாற்றுவோம்,
வியாழன், டிசம்பர் 08, 2011
TTA CONFIRMATION ORDERS ISSUED
Sl.No HRMS
No. Name of the official
Shri/Smt/Kum Community Date of Appointment Date of confirmation after completion of Probationary period
1 200800711 GANESH M OC 11-08-2008 11-08-2010
2 200800714 SELVAKUMAR A OBC 11-08-2008 11-08-2010
3 20080713 EGHUMALAI S OBC 16-08-2008 16-08-2010
4 200801085 EZHUMALAI V OBC 30-08-2008 30-08-2010
5 200802337 KARTHIKEYAN V OBC 04-10-2008 04-10-2010
6 200802216 MANIKANNAN D OBC 18-10-2008 18-10-2010
7 200802233 MURUGAN G OC 18-10-2008 18-10-2010
8 200802215 PUGAZHENDI R SC 18-10-2008 18-10-2010
9 200802331 RAJU K OBC 25-10-2008 25-10-2010
10 200802823 SIVASANKAR A OBC 10-11-2008 10-11-2010
No. Name of the official
Shri/Smt/Kum Community Date of Appointment Date of confirmation after completion of Probationary period
1 200800711 GANESH M OC 11-08-2008 11-08-2010
2 200800714 SELVAKUMAR A OBC 11-08-2008 11-08-2010
3 20080713 EGHUMALAI S OBC 16-08-2008 16-08-2010
4 200801085 EZHUMALAI V OBC 30-08-2008 30-08-2010
5 200802337 KARTHIKEYAN V OBC 04-10-2008 04-10-2010
6 200802216 MANIKANNAN D OBC 18-10-2008 18-10-2010
7 200802233 MURUGAN G OC 18-10-2008 18-10-2010
8 200802215 PUGAZHENDI R SC 18-10-2008 18-10-2010
9 200802331 RAJU K OBC 25-10-2008 25-10-2010
10 200802823 SIVASANKAR A OBC 10-11-2008 10-11-2010
செவ்வாய், நவம்பர் 22, 2011
BSNL WORKERS ALLIANCE
C-4/1, Bangla Sahib Road (Baird Road), New Delhi – 11001
Tel: 23746677, 23363245
No. TF-38/3 Dated 19.11.2011
To,
Chairman cum Managing Director
BSNL
New Delhi
Subject: Notice for Strike on 15th December, 2011.
Sir,
In accordance with the provisions contained in Sub-Para (1) of Section 22 of ID Act, we
hereby serve Strike Notice for 15th December, 2011 for settlement of the demands appended
below.
1. Withdraw the proposal of VRS to staff.
2. Restore financial viability of BSNL
(a) Compensate for uneconomical activities done by BSNL and continue grant of support
of Rs.2,000 crores in lieu off ADC.
(b) Release BSNL from payment of Pension liability of 40% as per DOT orders of 15th
June, 2006.
(c ) Choice for selecting 3G spectrum.
(d) Reimbursement of License fee as assured at the time of formation of BSNL
(e) Refund of Rs 8313 crores paid towards BWA spectrum band
(f) Discontinue and disband all TACS.
3. Immediate procurement of equipments (GSM, Cables, Dropwires, Modem etc)
4. 78.2% IDA fixation
5. Restoration of Medical Allowance, Leave encashment and LTC facilities.
6. Take steps for early repatriation of non-optee ITS officers.
7. Minimum Bonus to staff akin to CG employees.
8. Ensure dialogue with all the registered and applicant unions and extend minimum Trade
Union facilities.
We are compelled to serve the strike Notice as these demands are unresolved for a long
time despite pursuance at different levels.
Explanatory notes on demands will follow.
(Contd Page 2)
Copy to :- 1. Secretary, DOT, Sanchar Bhavan, New Delhi
2. Chief labour Commissioner ( C ), Shram Shakti Bhavan,
Rafi Marg New Delhi
3. All Alliance Partners.
4. All Circle Secretaries.
C-4/1, Bangla Sahib Road (Baird Road), New Delhi – 11001
Tel: 23746677, 23363245
No. TF-38/3 Dated 19.11.2011
To,
Chairman cum Managing Director
BSNL
New Delhi
Subject: Notice for Strike on 15th December, 2011.
Sir,
In accordance with the provisions contained in Sub-Para (1) of Section 22 of ID Act, we
hereby serve Strike Notice for 15th December, 2011 for settlement of the demands appended
below.
1. Withdraw the proposal of VRS to staff.
2. Restore financial viability of BSNL
(a) Compensate for uneconomical activities done by BSNL and continue grant of support
of Rs.2,000 crores in lieu off ADC.
(b) Release BSNL from payment of Pension liability of 40% as per DOT orders of 15th
June, 2006.
(c ) Choice for selecting 3G spectrum.
(d) Reimbursement of License fee as assured at the time of formation of BSNL
(e) Refund of Rs 8313 crores paid towards BWA spectrum band
(f) Discontinue and disband all TACS.
3. Immediate procurement of equipments (GSM, Cables, Dropwires, Modem etc)
4. 78.2% IDA fixation
5. Restoration of Medical Allowance, Leave encashment and LTC facilities.
6. Take steps for early repatriation of non-optee ITS officers.
7. Minimum Bonus to staff akin to CG employees.
8. Ensure dialogue with all the registered and applicant unions and extend minimum Trade
Union facilities.
We are compelled to serve the strike Notice as these demands are unresolved for a long
time despite pursuance at different levels.
Explanatory notes on demands will follow.
(Contd Page 2)
Copy to :- 1. Secretary, DOT, Sanchar Bhavan, New Delhi
2. Chief labour Commissioner ( C ), Shram Shakti Bhavan,
Rafi Marg New Delhi
3. All Alliance Partners.
4. All Circle Secretaries.
செவ்வாய், நவம்பர் 15, 2011
மாவட்டச்செயற்குழு
நாள்:-23/11/2011- மனமகிழ் மன்றம்-மாலை 0530
தலைமை:-A.மகேஸ்வரன், மாவட்டத்தலைவர்,
வரவேற்புரை:- A.ஹரிஹரன், மாவட்ட உதவிச்செயலர்,
துவக்கவுரை:-K.அசோகராஜன், மாநிலஉதவிச்செயலர்,
ஆய்படு பொருள்
v விருப்பஓய்வுத்திட்டம்-இன்றைய நிலை
v மத்திய செயற்குழு முடிவுகள்
v நிதி-வரவு செலவு கணக்கு-பரிசீலனை
v வெளிப்புற சுழல் மாற்றல்
v புதிய மாற்றல் கொள்கை-டென்யூர் மாற்றல்
v புதுவைத்தோழன்-நிதி
இதர தலைவர் அனுமதியுடன்
நன்றியுரை:-M.தயாளன்,மாவட்ட அமைப்புச்செயலர்
அனைவரும் வருக ! தோழமை வாழ்த்துக்களுடன்,
15/11/2011 P.காமராஜ்,மாவட்டச்செயலர்
இதற்கு குழுசேர்:
இடுகைகள் (Atom)